20th Annual Conference -- Resolutions

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

Resolutions

Click here for the Resolutions in easy to print pdf format

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION INDEX

JOINT RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. A-1, RELATING TO TRICARE FOR MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPONENT

RESOLUTION NO A-2, RELATING TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REQUIREMENTS FOR ANNUAL DENTAL EXAMINATION

RESOLUTION NO. A-3, RELATING TO AMENDMENT OF TITLE 10, USC, WHICH WOULD REDUCE FROM 60 TO 55 THE AGE AT WHICH A RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBER MAY BEGIN RECEIVING RETIREMENT PAY

RESOLUTION NO. A-4, RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF CIVILIAN ND UNIFORMED EMERGENCY RESPONDERS TO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

RESOLUTION NO. A-5, RELATING TO THE COMMUNICATION, EFFECTIVE MEASUREMENT, RAPID ASSESSMENT, AND PROVISION OF MILITARY MEDICAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE
TRAINING

RESOLUTION NO. A-6, RELATING TO ADDRESSING TRAUMATIC STRESS DURING A NATIONAL CRISIS

ARMY RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. B-1, RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD AVIATION

RESOLUTION NO. B-2, RELATING TO MODERNIZATION AND SUSTAINMENT OF ARNG COMBAT MANEUVER (MOUNTED) FORCE

RESOLUTION NO. B-3, RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARNG COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS AND INTELLIGENCE (C4I) AREAS

RESOLUTION NO. B-4, RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARNG’S FIRE SUPPORT/FIELD ARTILLERY BATTLE OPERATING SYSTEMS AND RELATED TRAINING DEVICES

RESOLUTION NO. B-5, RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARNG COMBAT SUPPORT/ COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT (CS/CSS) FORCE

RESOLUTION NO. B-6, RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD COMBAT ENGINEER FORCE

AIR RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. C-1, RELATING TO THE ANG FORCE STRUCTURE

RESOLUTION NO. C-4, RELATING TO THE ANG A/OA-10 AIRCRAFT

RESOLUTION NO. C-5, RELATING TO THE ANG C-130 AIRCRAFT

RESOLUTION NO. C-8, RELATING TO THE ANG KC-135 AIRCRAFT

RESOLUTION NO. C-10, RELATING TO THE PROCUREMENT OF PROMINA MULTIPLEXORS FOR ANG COMBAT COMM UNITS

RESOLUTION NO. C-11, RELATING TO THE PROCUREMENT / MODERNIZATION OF THEATER DEPLOYABLE COMMUNICATIONS (TDC) EQUIPMENT

PNGAS RESOLUTIONS
RESOLUTION NO. D-1, RELATING TO THE NEED TO FULLY RESOURCE COTS SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD COUNTERDRUG UNITS AND SUPPORT HOMELAND SECURITY MISSIONS

RESOLUTION NO. D-2, RELATING TO PROCUREMENT OF MILITARY TACTICAL
GENERATOR SETS

RESOLUTION NO. D-3, RELATING TO SMALL ARMS FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS
(SFACS II) FOR THE MK19 GRENADE LAUNCHER

RESOLUTION NO. D-4, RELATING TO DIRECT APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR NCOs
(E7-E9) AS WARRANT OFFICERS

RESOLUTION NO. D-5, RELATING TO BONUSES FOR NEWLY APPOINTED AND
COMMISSIONED OFFICERS AND WARRANT OFFICERS

RESOLUTION NO. D-6, RELATING TO CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR ALL STRYKER
BRIGADE COMBAT TEAMS

RESOLUTION NO. D-7, RELATING TO THE EXPEDITIONARY MEDICAL SUPPORT
(EMEDS) EQUIPMENT PACKAGE

RESOLUTION NO. D-8, RELATING TO THE BUY BACK OF TITLE 32 ACTIVE DUTY
TIME FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS

RESOLUTION NO. D-9, RELATING TO TAX INCENTIVES FOR EMPLOYERS OF RESERVE COMPONENT MILITARY PERSONNEL

RESOLUTION NO. D-10, RELATING TO FAIR CREDIT REPORTING FOR MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPONENTS

RESOLUTION NO. D-11, RELATING TO A DEDICATED NG SCHOLARSHIP FOR ROTC

RESOLUTION NO. D-12, RELATING TO, RELATING TO EXCLUDING ALL MILITARY PAY FROM THE DEFINITION OF EARNED INCOME FOR
LOCAL INCOME TAXES

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. A-1

RELATING TO TRICARE FOR MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE COMPONENT

Background:
The current world situation and downsizing of our active military forces has resulted in a "Total Force", Active, Guard and Reserve, performing duty side-by-side. The National Guard and Reserve Components maintain the same readiness standards as their active duty counterparts and participate in real world contingencies on a regular and more frequent basis. Over the years, the National Guard and Reserve Components have increasingly contributed to the superior capabilities of the nation’s military; however, incentives to join and serve their country still do not mirror those of the active component soldiers and airmen they serve alongside.

Medical readiness is an important factor in unit readiness. Recognizing the benefits of healthcare readiness, Congress directed the General Accounting Office to conduct a study on opening the TRICARE health program to members of the selected reserve. The GAO study reported back more than 21 percent of reservists do not have health insurance. Providing TRICARE during all phases of service increases unit readiness and improves its ability to carry out its missions.

The Congress authorized expanded healthcare for the Reserve Components in FY04 as a test. This provision must be made permanent in FY05. Mobilization readiness, retention and recruiting, all benefit from this essential provision of law.

The FY04 test implementation by Department of Defense has been slow, and the brief one-year program will not yield results that can be used to measure even preliminary success. Additionally, the benefit was further restricted to those without current health insurance programs. Those service-members may be paying significantly more than the proposed Tricare option or not have all of the protections Tricare offers.

The overwhelming interest expressed by service-members in this crucial program make it clear to the senior leadership of all the services that a demonstrated need still exists, and our force eagerly awaits enrollment information.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, Departments of the Army and the Air Force, the Department of Defense and the Congress of the United States work to make the expanded healthcare benefits appropriated as a test in FY04 - PERMANENT IN LAW - to include all Selective Reserve component personnel and their families who desire to enroll in the program without restriction of any kind.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. A-2

RELATING TO A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REQUIREMENT FOR ANNUAL DENTAL EXAMINATIONS

Background:
The Department of Defense (DoD) requires each of us have an annual dental examination. DoD found dental readiness problems throughout the military -- readiness problems resulting in significant amounts of lost duty time. For reservists, 70% of dental "emergencies" were found to be preventable by examination and treatment prior to activation. Thirty percent (30%) of AF Reserves activated in Desert Storm/Shield were Class 3 (significant dental problems), which should have disqualified member from worldwide duty.

The Solution according to the DoD:
DoD mandated Annual Dental Examination (ADE): completed by your civilian dentist annually, each intervening year of your Physical Examination & Standards (PES) cycle.

• Non-flyers PES every 5 years, so ADE needed each of the intervening 4 years.
• Flyers PES every 3 years, so ADE needed each of the intervening 2 years.

The Problem:
There is no dental coverage for this required procedure for the traditional or M-Day member of the National Guard. Although some members may have their own coverage through civilian employment, 100% dental coverage does not exist. This creates a large number of National Guard members being forced by DoD directive to pay out of pocket for this annual dental examination.

Recommendation:
It is recommended of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that funding be appropriated to allow for membership of all National Guard Soldiers and Airman into the TriCare Dental Plan. This will allow for the offset of the costs to members complying with the new Department of Defense Annual Dental Examination directive

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. A-3

RELATING TO AMENDMENT TITLE 10, USC WHICH WOULD REDUCE FROM 60 TO 55 THE AGE AT WHICH A RESERVE COMPONENT MEMBER MAY BEGIN RECEIVING RETIREMENT PAY

Background:
The use of the National Guard and Reserve Component in the last two and half years has marked the largest sustained call-up since the Vietnam War. With the National Guard and the Reserve Component make up 40% of the nearly 125,000 United States troops in Iraq.

With the age limit for receipt of retired pay by National Guard and Reserve Component service members was set decades ago when the National Guard and Reserve were not relied upon the way they are today. The men and women who serve in our reserve component are the soldiers and airmen who are instrumental in maintaining our Nation’s defense.

Current law states that a retired reserve component member will begin to draw military retired pay upon reaching 60 years of age. With National Guard members joining the National Guard when graduating from high school or soon after it is a greater decision to stay or separate from the National Guard with the influence of high deployments and personnel sacrifice. This benefit is needed due to the importance of retention and recruitment.

Reducing the age of retirement will help reduce some of the disparity in retirement benefits that vest immediately upon discharge for our active duty counterparts.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations to urge the Department of Defense and the Congress of the United States to support legislation to amend Title 10, USC to reduce receipt of retired reserve military pay from 60 to age 55.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. A-4

RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF CIVILIAN AND UNIFORMED EMERGENCY
RESPONDERS TO WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION

Background:
As the Nation directs its resources in response to the War on Terrorism, the provision of appropriate training for dealing with the medical response to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) is urgently required for the Civilian and Uniformed Emergency Responder Communities, to include the Reserve Components.

At this time, it appears that the Federal Government will not be able to provide sufficient funding to each of the 50 states for such training, nor that the National Guard and reserve components will receive funding to cover all WMD-specific training requirements. A cost-effective approach for this enormous undertaking can be ensured through the identification and cost-effective use of time-tested training programs, which meet quality assessment and certification standards.

The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Casualty Care Research Center (CCRC) Programs have successfully 1) coordinated joint civil-military interoperability response plans; 2) provided military-unique, national standard, assessment-driven curricula and certification for over 6,000 emergency responders from more than 750 agencies on the crisis management response to: weapons of mass destruction; counter terrorism; protective operations; hostage rescue; explosive ordnance disposal; and, major national security events; and, 3) initiated individual programs for civilian hospitals to ensure continuity of WMD training for future staff. Since September 11, 2001, the CCRC Mission Support Center has had an increasing frequency of requests for consultative support in the areas of crisis management and special operations experience relevant to military medicine. The CCRC has served DoD well as a bridge between the DoD, other Federal agencies, and the Civilian Emergency Communities. The USUHS CCRC Program, if fully funded at $1.6 million, could be cost-effectively shared with state and local emergency responders, to include the National Guard and Reserve Components, across the Nation. The USUHS CCRC would generate cost avoidance by providing its programs to the Emergency Responder Communities through distance learning and by bringing the CCRC instructors to the students.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States: Provide permanent funding for the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Casualty Care Research Center (CCRC) annual to be included within the USUHS budget. Doing so, will enable the USUHS CCRC to provide cost-effective, data-driven and certified training to the Reserve Components.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. A-5

RELATING TO THE COMMUNICATION, EFFECTIVE MEASUREMENT, RAPID ASSESSMENT, AND PROVISION OF MILITARY MEDICAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TRAINING

Background:
The specialized expertise, consultation, training, education, and research capabilities of the Military Health System (MHS) must be expeditiously identified, assessed, and cost-effectively shared with the Uniformed and Civilian Medical Support Communities, to include the Reserve Components, for assisting in their response to, and the critical management of, the devastating impact of WMD-related terrorism, natural disasters, and humanitarian assistance contingencies.

At this time, it appears that the Federal Government will not be able to provide sufficient funding to each of the 50 states for Military Medical Humanitarian Assistance (MMHA) training, nor that the Reserve Components will receive funding to cover all WMD-specific training and assessment requirements. A cost-effective approach for this enormous undertaking can be ensured through the identification and communication of disaster assessment capabilities and the availability of MMHA training between the Uniformed and Civilian Medical Support Communities, to include the Reserve Components.

The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine (CDHAM) serves as a military-unique focal point, or clearinghouse, for the MHS for developments in the areas of disaster and humanitarian assistance medicine. CDHAM personnel conduct studies for the MHS to measure the effectiveness of MMHA and to provide rapid assessment of Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance requirements. In response to the urgent demand for MMHA training across the Uniformed and Civilian Medical Support Communities, CDHAM has developed and distributed MMHA Courses covering eleven specialties. In addition, the USUHS CDHAM provides: 1) military unique curricula for MHS and civilian residency programs; 2) the development of ultrasound imaging training for disaster response; 3) PDA/handheld computer software platforms for disaster needs and assessment; and, 4) direct MMHA support to four regional Unified Combatant Commands. The USUHS CDHAM, if fully funded at $960,000, could cost-effectively share its expertise and MMHA capabilities with state and local emergency responders across the Nation, to include the Reserve Components.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States:
 Provide permanent annual funding for the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Center for Disaster and Humanitarian Assistance Medicine (CDHAM to be included within the USUHS budget. Doing so, will enable the USUHS CDHAM to provide cost effective support to the Reserve Components.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. A-6

RELATING TO ADDRESSING TRAUMATIC STRESS DURING A NATIONAL CRISIS

Background:
Traumatic Stress is a critical factor, which must be addressed during a national crisis. The successful assessment and management of the behavioral, psychological, and social consequences of WMD-related and other national security contingencies is essential to DoD and the Nation during the organization of effective responses to such events. Failure to attend to the consequences of WMD may lead to panic or demoralization and could further terrorists' goal to undermine the Armed Forces' and American Citizens' confidence in their government and its institutions.

At this time, it appears that the Federal Government will not be able to provide sufficient funding to each of the 50 states for the assessment and management of the traumatic impact following a terrorist event, nor that the Reserve Components will receive funding to ensure the response to these requirements. A cost-effective approach for this enormous undertaking can be ensured through the maximized sharing of military-unique expertise in both the assessment and management of the traumatic consequences of a WMD-related terrorist incident between the Uniformed and Civilian Medical Support Communities, to include the Reserve Components.

The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress (the Center) was established in 1987 as a center of excellence for responding to DoD's concerns over the substantial health risks resulting from the traumatic impact of the possibility, or actual use of, WMD during combat, acts of terrorism, or hostage events. The USUHS Center has achieved worldwide recognition; since the events of September 11, 2001, the Center has continuously provided military unique expertise and consultative support relevant to crisis management, disaster response, and homeland defense in response to WMD-related events. The USUHS Center, if fully funded at $1.2 million, could cost-effectively share its expertise and military unique capabilities with state and local emergency responders across the Nation, to include the Reserve Components.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States:
 Provide permanent annual funding for the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress within the USUHS budget. Doing so, will enable the USUHS Center to permanently provide the Reserve Components with military unique medical expertise and consultative support for the response to traumatic stress.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. B-1

RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD AVIATION

Background:
The Transformation and Modernization of Army National Guard Aviation is critical for the successful accomplishment of the Guard’s dual Federal and State Missions. The ARNG Aviation Program has suffered from a lack of a consistent strategy in the past. A renewed emphasis on resourcing is needed to reenergize the ARNG Aviation Program and allow it to attain the full partnership with the Army that it deserves in order to support the full range of National Security Objectives.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, and the Congress of the United States support authorization and appropriation for Army National Guard Aviation that includes, but is not limited to the following:
 The need to fully resource the documented requirement in all Army National Guard utility helicopter units with the UH-60L/M to ensure relevance of the Army National Guard aviation to the warfight;
 The need to fully resource the documented requirement in all Army National Guard attack helicopter battalions to the AH-64D, in completed deployability configuration to ensure relevance of Army National Guard aviation to the warfight, including all BLOCK III (3) enhancements to the same quantities like units in the active component;
 The need to fully resource the documented requirement in all Army National Guard cargo helicopter units to the CH-47F configuration to ensure relevance of Army National Guard aviation to the warfight;
 The need to fully resource the documented requirement in all Army National Guard Aeromedical units with the HH-60 to ensure relevance to the warfight and the WMD-CST mission;
 The need for NORTHCOM/PACOM to recognize and include the ARNG State Fixed Wing Flight Detachments as mission essential for support of the Homeland Defense Mission;
 Acquisition and upgrade of adequate training and simulation devices (TESS and AVCATT) for modernized systems to accomplish individual and collective aviation training in the most efficient and economical manner;
 The need to fully resource the documented requirement in all ARNG Cargo Fixed Wing Units with a modernized Aircraft to ensure relevance of Army National Guard Aviation to the Warfight;
 The need to leverage emerging technologies to maximize aircraft performance and safety by the acquisition of systems such as crashworthy crew and troop seats; inflatable cockpit restraint systems; aircraft imbedded health monitoring systems; night vision systems; crashworthy ballistically tolerant auxiliary fuel systems; life support for trauma and transportation; rescue hoist systems; ASE; and Aircrew Survival Radios;
 The need to retain all the Generating Force Air Ambulance units in the Army National Guard.
 The need to procure a replacement Aircraft for the OH-58 for the continuation of the Counter-drug RAID Mission;
 The need to acquire an Airborne A2C2S System that provides for situational awareness and communications throughout the full range of Homeland Defense and battlespace requirements; and
 The need to obtain the force structure and equipment for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) capability in ARNG Aviation Units for Warfighting, Homeland Security and Counter-drug Operations.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. B-2

RELATING TO MODERNIZATION AND SUSTAINMENT OF ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
COMBAT MANEUVER (MOUNTED) FORCE

Background:
The purpose of the Army’s mounted force is to dominate the maneuver battle and ensure decisive victory with minimum loss of life and material. Mounted forces are heavy units equipped with tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and supporting arms of similar mobility and survivability. The Active Component (AC) modernized its mounted force with M1A2 and M1A1 tanks and M2A2 Operation Desert Storm (ODS) and M2A3 Bradley Family of Fighting Vehicles. The Active Component (AC) has full digitization embedded into its systems or added to its systems by way of appliqué subsystems. While AC mounted force modernization continues, programs designed to modernize and sustain Army National Guard (ARNG) mounted forces have been either cancelled or remain unfunded. The unequal fielding of modernized systems between the AC and ARNG’s mounted forces creates significant unequal capabilities within the total force and exacerbates problems related to creating a seamless force operating on a digitized battlefield. The cascade of modernized tanks and infantry fighting vehicles caused by conversion of selected AC armored and mechanized brigades to initial and Interim “Medium Brigades” will provide only minimal near term assets.

Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support authorization and appropriation for the modernization and sustainment of the ARNG Combat Maneuver Force Battle Operating Systems (BOS) (“Total Package Fielding”) and applicable support and training systems at the same rate as the active Army until all Army National Guard requirements are satisfied to include but not limited to the following:
 Extend the service life of Army National Guard M1 series tanks through the Abrams Integrated Management (AIM) program, and continue recapitalization of Army National Guard M1 series tanks, upgrading to the M1A2 version through FY 2025;
 Upgrade all Army National Guard M2A0 and M3A0 to M2A2/M3A2 Bradley fighting vehicles, including variants (Bradley-Fist), and upgrade the M2A2/M3A2 to the M2A2 ODS;
 Conversion of M88A1 tank recovery vehicles to the M88A2 Hercules version;
 Formally determine and fill the total requirements on the Bradley fighting vehicles, including variants, of the Army National Guard, prior to filling other army or foreign military sales requirements;
 Upgrade the M113 family of vehicles to M113A3 configuration in every Army National Guard mechanized and armored brigade and armored cavalry regiment equipped with the M2A2 and M2A2 Operation Desert Storm variant of the Bradley fighting vehicle; and
 Extend the service life of M2/M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicles of the Army National Guard through a service life extension program, and continue recapitalization of Army National Guard BFVs through FY 2025.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. B-3

RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS AND INTELLIGENCE (C4I) AREAS

Background:
The Army National Guard (ARNG) as a part of the "Information Age Army" is badly in danger of becoming a "second Army" at a time of rapid changes in automation, computing, and requirements for up-to-date information, communications technologies, and major changes in strategic and domestic environments. These characteristics are causing unprecedented modernization requirements for the Total Army in the area of command, control, and communications systems.C4I modernization in the Army has, in many cases, not included the Army National Guard, creating serious problems with regard to compatibility and integration in training and operations. C4I advanced technologies enhance the capabilities of the Military Intelligence areas such as providing support to the Army in areas of counter terrorism and weapons of mass destruction proliferation.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support authorization and appropriation for the modernization (100% Operational Compatibility with the active Army, 100% Deployability of ARNG equipment) of the ARNG Command, Control, Communications and Computers and Intelligence (C4I) systems (“Total Package Fielding”) including all appropriate associated communications support and mission essential equipment.
Priority requirements include the following as ranked by the C4I Task Force:
 Enhanced Position Locating System (EPLRS). EPLRS is a situational awareness computer and software system that is utilized at all levels of the battlefield. To be relevant and deployable, ARNG units must obtain this equipment;
 "Shadow" Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV);
 "Phoenix" - AN/USC-60 Triband tactical satellite terminals including their prime movers for Echelons Above Corps (EAC) ARNG signal battalions and brigades;
 Warfighter Information Network (WIN-T). WIN-T is the follow-on communications system for all Total Army signal units from battalion to EAC. WIN-T is nearing the end of its research-and-development phase and soon will be coming into the Army. inventory. It will merge what we now know as MSE for corps and below and DGM TRI-TAC for EAC (and the Air Force). WIN-T will be fielded in theater sets;
 Sentinel. AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel Radar for Forward Area Air Defense (FAAD);and
 Completing equipment fielding for the new divisional intelligence battalions that are to be activated in the ARNG's seven divisions that do not have organic battalions;
 Other issues include:
 Complete suites of All Source Analysis Systems to include all appropriate associated communications support and mission essential equipment for military Intelligence units;
 Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio Systems (SINCGARS ASIP);
 Ground Station Mobile/Common Ground Station;
 Ground Based Common Sensor or equivalent electronic warfare;
 Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Automation Systems;
 Funding for additional training of Army National Guard Military Intelligence personnel to insure adequate training in technical areas; and
 Trojan Spirit Satellite Communication System.
 Authorize and appropriate funds during FY2006 through FY2007 for the purchase of the ACUS Modernization systems for the ARNG signal divisional, Corps, and EAC units in order for them to be an active participant in the total Army and support the critical mission of homeland defense
 SMART-T satellite terminals for Army National Guard Division Signal Battalions and the Corps Signal Battalions.

Finally, it is strongly recommended that National Guard Bureau and the Department of the Army proceed immediately to reorganize the ARNG EAC signal structure into the Integrated Tactical Signal Battalion (ITSB) configuration mirroring the reorganization already underway in the active Army. Successful implementation of the ITSB structure, however is dependent on both the procurement of the AN/USC-60 (see above) and the cascading of legacy AN/TSC-85 and 93 tactical satellite terminals from the active component to the Guard and Reserve as the USC-60 "Phoenix" is field in the active Army.
20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. B-4

RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD’S FIRE SUPPORT/FIELD ARTILLERY BATTLE OPERATING SYSTEMS AND RELATED TRAINING DEVICES

Background:
A significant amount of the Army’s Field Artillery force lies within the Army National Guard. Their mobilization is vital to the success of our National Security requirements. This requires that simultaneous programming and fielding of equipment with the active component and that the readiness levels of these units be maintained at a high level.
Relevance and readiness of the ARNG can only be achieved through re-capitalization and modernization to support the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) and Transformation. The focus of ARNG field artillery modernization is systems and platforms that support the delivery of the full suite of current and future munitions. Digitization enables the ARNG to provide for C4I in the Contemporary Operating Environment is paramount.
The continued modernization of these systems is critical to meeting future force objectives. The overall objectives of ARNG modernization includes 100% Operational Compatibility with the active Army, 100% Deployability of ARNG equipment, “Total Package Fielding” including new equipment training, life cycle funding (cost) and associated training devices.
We must provide fully modernized and trained field artillery units capable of mobilizing for active federal service in time of war or national emergency.

Recommendation:
That the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations recommends the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support authorization and appropriation for the modernization and sustainment of the ARNG Fire Support Battlefield Operating Systems (BOS) (“Total Package Fielding”) and applicable support and training systems to include but not limited to the following:
 Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS) Equipment and Training;
 Long Range Digital Radio Communications (HF Harris Radios, SATCOM);
 M270A1 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS);
 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS);
 Lightweight 155MM Towed M777;
 M109A6 155MM SP Howitzer PALADIN;
 M992A2 Field Artillery Ammunition Support Vehicle (FAASV);
 Fire Support Sensor Systems (FS3);
 Wireless Gun Display Units;
 Lightweight Laser Designator Range Finder (LLDR);
 VIPER (Laser Range Finder Binocular);
 MARK VII Target Location System;
 Upgrade AN/TPQ 36 Target Acquisition Radar;
 KNIGHT Fire Support Vehicle (HMMWV Platform);
 Bradley Fire Support Vehicle (BFIST);
 Upgrade Gun Laying Positioning System (GLPS);
 Meteorological Measuring Set-PROFILER (AN/TMQ-52);
 Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck/Trailer (HEMTT/HEMATT);
 Improved Position Azimuth Determining System (IPADS);
 Integrated Family Test Equipment (IFTE);
 AN/TPQ 47 Fire Finder Radar;
 Fire Support Combined Arms Tactical Trainer-Towed (FSCATT-T);
 Fire Support Combined Arms Tactical Trainer-M109A6 (FSCATT);
 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) Trainer; and
 M119 HOWITZER

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. B-5

RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
COMBAT SUPPORT/ COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT (CS/CSS) FORCE

Background:
The Army National Guard (ARNG) comprises 46 percent of the total Army Combat Support force and 32 percent of the Combat Service Support force. The ARNG is playing an increasing role in the area of logistics and combat service support as our nation conducts the Global War on Terrorism while continuing to address the other threats around the world. The ARNG is also a major component of Homeland Security. Responsive support to combat units plays a pivotal role in the success of any military operation. As the National Guard continues to increase its participation in the Nation’s operational commitments, the support units must be prepared and ready. Support units should possess the same modernized equipment as the active component in order to maximize combat power, insure mission success, and increase soldier survivability.

For years, the Army National Guard has suffered from years of modernization neglect. Essential equipment modernization of items such as the complete serials of wheeled vehicles to include HMMWVs, 2 1/2 and 5 ton trucks, tractor trailers, trailers, HEMTTs, major weapons systems, shelters, decontamination and night vision equipment has, for too long, been delayed. These items are necessary for successful support of combat units as well as providing essential capabilities in support of the ARNG’s response to disaster relief and state emergencies.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support authorization and appropriation for overdue modernization of the ARNG CS/CSS force. This modernization should provide for 100% compatibility with the active component, mirror the rate of active component modernization, and comply with the “Total Package Fielding” concept. Priority CS/CSS modernization systems include the following:
 Heavy expanded mobility tactical truck (HEMTT) M977 series to include the Load Handling System (M1120) with trailer (M1076/M1077) and Container Roll Out/IN Platform (CROP) and the Container Handling Unit (CHU);
 Up-armored HMMWVS (M1114) for all National Guard units expected to perform combat, combat support, combat service support, peacekeeping or domestic support missions;
 High mobility multi purpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV) M998A2 series;
 Family of medium tactical vehicles (FMTV);
 FMTV 5 ton M1088A1 tractors and M871A3 companion 22.5-ton semi-trailers;
 Modernizing M915 family of vehicles with M915A3, M916A3 light equipment transporters, and M917A2 dump trucks;
 Modernize ARNG electrical generating capability with the Tactical Quiet Generator System, (TQGS);
 Night vision equipment (AN/PVS-7; Mark VII; GEN IV, and equipment/devices to support “owning the night” end state);
 M-22 Automatic Chemical Agent Alarm (ACADA) and MCAD;
 M17 Lightweight Decontamination System (LDS) (Note: The Chemical Decon Units should maintain the authorization for the M12 Decon apparatus and M12 should be funded for modernization and repair parts);
 M872 34-ton semi-trailer;
 Heavy Equipment Transporters (HETS);
 Drive On/Off Secondary Containment System (DOCS);
 AN/VAS-5 Driver’s Vision Enhancer (DVE);
 Modular General-Purpose Tent System (MGPTS);
 Chemical Biological Protected Shelter (CBPS); and
 Driver Simulation Units.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. B-6

RELATING TO THE MODERNIZATION OF THE ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
COMBAT ENGINEER FORCE

Background:
Engineer units provide mobility and counter-mobility missions to support combat units on the battlefield. Additionally, in both a peacetime and wartime environment, engineers build(construct) roads, schools and other facilities that improve the infrastructure in(of) developing nations such as those in Central America. Currently, over 52% of the entire engineer force can be found in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Modernization of those units, however, lags behind the combat forces, which they support. The ARNG engineer forces with ARNG Divisions are missioned but only receive 15% of total Army engineer funds. The ARNG’s combat engineer force is considerably behind the modernization effort of its fleet of engineering vehicles when compared to its Active Component (AC) counterparts. In addition to its combat capability, the ARNG Engineer efforts lend critical support to the community during emergency response and disaster relief efforts.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. C-1

RELATING TO THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD FORCE STRUCTURE

Background:
The Air National Guard (ANG) proves to be an effective day-to-day complementary force for the Air Force. The National Guard provides a dual capability service to the nation. It serves as the first line backup to meet federal national security requirements; they are the first responders to domestic disasters, and civil unrest. The reduction of the total Defense Budget over the past decade and the decrease in Air Force spending significantly affects the ability of the ANG to effectively maintain required operations tempo. The force structure of both the Air Force and ANG continues to decrease from levels achieved during FY 90. The uncertain stability of many potential danger areas throughout the world and the adoption of a “Win/Win” strategy makes retention of credible, total Air Force capabilities essential to the security of the nation. Maintaining force in the ANG is a cost-effective method of providing maximum defense capability within a limited peacetime budget. The Department of Defense is now tasking the National Guard and Reserve Components to become a “Shape and Respond,” full spectrum force. The Air Force reorganization, under the Expeditionary Aerospace Force (EAF) concept, consists of 10 Air Expeditionary Forces (AEF). The “Shaping” mission requires high operations and personnel tempo, which requires significantly more participation by the ANG, and this drive will require higher crew ratios.

Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support funding to:
 Retain all current flying units in the ANG to maintain or increase the ANG portion of the equivalent mix. Increase and maintain fighter units at 18 Primary Authorized Aircraft (PAA);
 Increase crew ratio of all ANG Units as required to support the EAF;
 Maintain, or increase, the ANG Airlift and Air Refueling unit structure;
 Maintain at a minimum 12 PAA C-130’s where they currently exist and maintain Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) proposed Air Defense/Air Sovereignty unit structure; and
 Maintain QDR proposed Air Defense/Air Sovereignty unit structure in order to retain qualified personnel and sufficient structure as compensating leverage to reduce risks and contain defense cost in the post Cold War world.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. C-4

RELATING TO THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD A/OA-10

Background:
The A/OA-10 is project to provide combat capability as part of the fighter force through the year 2028. Originally scheduled to phase out during the 1990s, the A-10 proved itself a valuable asset during the 1991s Gulf War, Allied Force (Kosovo), and again in OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM. The A-10 continues today to provide critical Close Air Support for our ground forces in Iraq and Afghanistan as part of OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM. In Iraq, Air National Guard (ANG) A-10s equipped with Litening II Targeting Pods provided search and destroy capabilities that stopped Iraq forces from employing their most feared weapons against friendly forces or the people of Iraq. In addition, ANG A-10s were largely responsible for the heavy attrition of Republican Guard forces before they were able to engage coalition ground forces. There is no other combat capability available to US Combatant Commanders at such an affordable price, with such a proven track record.

To remain effective and survivable on the modern digital battlefield, key A-10 systems require upgrade while additional targeting pods are required to fully equip the fleet. The basic airframe structure is planned and tentatively funded for refurbishment over the next few years to sustain service life to the 2028 by a program known as the Service Life Extension Program (SLEP). A software and hardware modification program called Precision Engagement (PE) is planned to support targeting pod integration and smart weapon employment providing the A-10 a true precision-guide capability but program completion is several years away and programmed funding is at risk as the Air force prioritizes limited resources. And although the A-10 Precision Engagement (PE) Program includes a data link, delays in a DoD-approved solution will cause initial PE fielding without a data link. Data link is imperative since it provides cockpit information on the location of friendly forces, greatly reducing the possibility of fratricide while building pilot situational awareness. Therefore, ANG advocates an interim, but immediate fielding of the Situation Awareness Data Link/Enhanced Precision Location Radio System (SADL/EPLRS) with Precision Engagement as the permanent follow-on solution. As the battlefield has transformed, A-10 tasking has shifted from low altitude missions to medium altitude where current engine performance is inadequate in the face of expected enemy threats an engineering study is warranted to determine the best way to increase engine performance for the A-10. Three of six ANG A-10 units have been equipped with a new simulator, the Full Mission Trainer ANG greatly enhancing pilot training however, no funding is programmed to equip the remaining units.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense and the Congress of the United States support funding to:
 Accelerate the fielding of the first spiral of the Precision Engagement (PE) program, while seeking enough funds for Litening II Pods for all ANG A-10 units;
 As an interim solution, immediately field Situation Awareness Data Link/Enhanced Precision Location Radio System (SADL/EPLRS) with Precision Engagement (PE) as the permanent follow-on solution.
 Ensure the A-10 Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) although currently fully funded, remains as programmed through completion;
 Fully fund the study to determine the best way to improve A-10 engine performance and then follow through with the study’s findings; and
 Complete the purchase of Full Mission Trainers for all ANG A-10 units and 3 units remain to be equipped.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. C-5

RELATING TO THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD C-130 AIRCRAFT

Background:
The Air National Guard (ANG) possesses 49% of the total theater airlift force structure and participates in worldwide operations more than ever before. The ANG continues this level of support despite an aging fleet of aircraft. Approximately 30% of the ANG C-130 fleet consists of C-130E model aircraft, which are more than 30 years old. The C-130J is the latest generation model that incorporates a redesigned, two-crew member flight station, a modern technology propulsion system, and an integrated digital avionics subsystem. The program continues a modernization effort focused on eventually replacing aging C/EC-130E aircraft.

Modernization:
In addition to replacing the older C-130E model aircraft, a number of systems in the remaining C/EC/HC/LC-130 fleet need modernizing in order for the ANG to standardize and be able to participate more effectively in the Total Force Mission. Specifically, the defensive systems (LAIRCM), radar and avionics require modernization to ensure the survivability, safety and effectiveness of the C-130 aircraft fleet. Propulsion systems modernization will enhance performance and readiness while reducing operation and support costs.

Recommendation
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support funding to:
 Procure C-130J-30 and EC-130 J Tactical Airlift aircraft and their spares and support equipment for the;
 Completion of the units that began conversion;
 Procure LAIRCM for ANG C-130H;
 Support full finding to the Avionics Modernization Program (AMP);
 Procure airborne wideband satellite connectivity for the entire Commando Solo EC-130 fleet;
 Procure an aircrew-training device for the EC 130J mission systems;
 Modernize and standardize mission equipment in existing C/EC/HC/LC-130 inventory to update
 Avionics, navigation, radar, defensive, and other mission systems;
 Modernize the propulsion systems in the existing C/EC/HC/LC-130 inventory including the evaluation of new propeller systems; and
 Procure Synthetic Aperture Radar System for LC-130 aircraft.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. C-8

RELATING TO THE AIR NATIONAL GUARD KC-135 AIRCRAFT

Background:
The KC-135 aircraft, on average, exceeds 40 years of age. Replacement aircraft are necessary to sustain the global air refueling mission in the future. Older model KC-135 aircraft currently violate ICAO Stage IV standards for noise. KC-135R- model tankers meet ICAO Stage IV requirements.

Due to large costs associated with converting KC-135 aircraft, focus turned to introducing a modernized aerial refueling platform to counter the negative trends of long lead times for parts and increased costs associated with aging aircraft issues that currently plague the KC-135 fleet. A new wide-body aircraft, equipped with the Multi Point Refueling System (MPRS) would dramatically enhance the air refueling and strategic airlift capabilities of the tanker force enabling it to better meet the future trends of rapid deployments and global engagement. However, this new platform will not see operational service in the near future.

Modernization:
The United States Air Force inventory of aircraft includes KC-135R model tanker aircraft in the active component and KC-135E and R model tanker aircraft in the Air Reserve Component (ARC), with all of the E-Models assigned to the Air National Guard. The KC-135 is the recognized workhorse of the U.S. Tanker Fleet and continues to be instrumental in the pursuit of our nation’s policy goals. The KC-135R model aircraft is a re-engined version with dramatically improved performance and greatly reduced cost due to fundamental improvements in design, materials, and engine maintenance concepts as well as vastly improved fuel consumption. The KC-135R provides 40% more refueling capability in combat conditions. The KC-135R can offload 20,000 lbs. more fuel across the full spectrum of operational environments. In contrast, the KC-135 E-model fleet, which numbers approximately 100 aircraft assigned to Air National Guard units throughout the nation, has significant operational shortfalls that threaten its continued relevance in the future force structure. The E-model relies on the aging Pratt & Whitney TF-33-PW-102 engine that has a historic failure rate approximately 17 times greater than the CFM-56 engine used on the R-model. Combine this decreased reliability with its lower performance, increased maintenance and overhaul costs, and Stage III non-compliance, and the result is an air refueling platform that lacks inter-fly capability with the active duty and is not an equal partner in today’s “total force” environment.

Recommendation
To meet the National Guard’s stated goal of being “Relevant, Reliable, Ready, and Accessible” to support America’s continued reliance on global Air refueling, it is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, and the Congress of the United States support funding Convert the ANG KC-135E aircraft to the R configuration;
 Transfer additional KC-135R model aircraft from Active Duty Units to the aging KC-135 fleet.
 Procure a modern air refueling aircraft replacement for the KC-135 fleet

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. C-10

RELATING TO THE PROCUREMENT OF PROMINA MULTIPLEXORS FOR
AIR NATIONAL GUARD COMBAT COMM UNITS

Background:
Reconstitution of Theater Deployable Communications (TDC) suites to deployed units and early delivery to additional active duty units coupled with funding reductions to the TDC program have combined to marginalize the contribution of Air National Guard (ANG) combat comm. units that are scheduled to receive TDC suites later in the program. These units are forced to train with either obsolete legacy equipment or technically deficient interim equipment. In either case, they train on equipment that they will not operate in the theater, works marginally at best at home station, and further precludes the network and switch sections from extending services to users—which then negatively impacts their readiness since they rarely get to exercise live. Training on the last war’s equipment and depending on “just in time” training today for a significant proportion of the nation’s deployable communications assets to become combat useful is a surefire recipe for disaster for which the ANG will take the blame.

The solution must resolve the training and readiness issue yet is compatible with the future deployable communications architecture—it cannot wait another five years bridging a gap since the demand exists today. Taking a page of the TDC program and using the Promina Multiplexor suite offers a very compatible solution at a reasonable cost to keep ANG units instantly combat useful.
 TSQ-111 CNCE vans (designed in the 70’s) served to support a theater in a cold war environment (Europe or Korea). With bulk, weight and technology has made them three generations obsolete. There are recurring costs associated with them that could be recaptured or redirected.
 RAMTEC (designed mid 90’s) was a grassroots ANG designed interim capability that was intended to bridge a short time gap until TDC fielding but suffered from design flaws. The base FCC-100 Multiplexor served admirably during the Gulf War but is now commercially obsolete. Most units did not receive a suite. Various other home grown or one-of-a-kind solutions exist.
 RAMTEC II (redesigned 01) resolves the flaws and attempts to bridge the time gap but does not take an evolutionary step to the TDC suite. Its cost is near equivalent to the TDC program’s Promina Multiplexor suite.
 Resolves training issue—we will be using the same standard deployable architecture equipment at home station that is used today in the theater and contingencies. We will be able to come up live all the time. Deploy in reverse order from TDC schedule to close gap faster.
 Invests in equipment that is par of the current TDC program. The logistics tail already exists. The program office may be willing to provide acquisition assistance based on economies of scale.
 Matches ANG units with the service providers at the STEP and REACHBACK sites, yet interfaces in the TRI-TAC switch equipment. Allows rapid integration into any TDC equipped unit.
 The equipment is deployable if necessary. Fully complements the TDC suites when they are finally delivered. Is completely compatible with existing transmission systems.
 The cost is roughly $100K for the basic unit, plus network and subscriber cards, and the ancillary cryptographic and protocol conversion equipment.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Air Combat Command, the Department of the Air Force, and the Department of Defense to urge the Congress of the United States to provide immediate funding to procure the Promina Multiplexor suite for all Air Guard Combat Communication Units.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. C-11

RELATING TO THE PROCUREMENT / MODERNIZATION OF THEATER DEPLOYABLE
COMMUNICATIONS (TDC) EQUIPMENT

Background:
It is imperative that Air National Guard Combat Communications units are able to train on a continuing basis on relevant equipment. The next generation of communication equipment for the Combat Communications units, both Active and Guard, is Theater Deployable Communications Equipment (TDC) equipment and highly mobile Ground Mobile Forces SATCOM terminals such as the AN/USC-60 Flyaway Tri-band Satellite Terminal (FSAT). At the present time there are only a few of the Air National Guard units equipped with this state of the art equipment.
Combat Communications units must have this equipment and be trained to perform their mission in support of Operation Enduring Freedom or any other contingency. Unfortunately, the Air Force procurement program responsible for fielding this equipment is way behind and there is not enough money available to purchase the full suite of this equipment on a timely schedule. This leaves the majority of the Air National Guard Units under-equipped and with no means to train on this state of the art equipment. Even if the personnel could deploy to a base in the Area of Responsibility (AOR), which has TDC/FSAT equipment, they would have a tremendous learning curve on the deployed TDC/FSAT equipment. This is further complicated by the fact Air National Guard units equipped with the TDC equipment, have deployed assets and personnel in support of current operational requirements and had to return home without their TDC equipment due to continuing requirements and limited TDC equipment availability. This leaves absolutely no means for Air National Guard personnel to train and maintain proficiency.
Unlike other Reserve Components, the Air National Guard is ready to deploy immediately in theater and perform their mission upon arrival. There is no training or spin up time required to deploy Air National Guard personnel, as there is with the other components. However, in order to do this, the Air National Guard units must be properly equipped. At first glance, accelerating the buy program for the full TDC/FSAT suite would appear to be the obvious solution, but this program is already behind schedule and competes with the Active Force for funds to purchase this equipment. Unfortunately, there are many higher priority Air Force requirements, and an increase in funding is extremely unlikely. The ANG has been placed in the tenuous position of not being able to train our personnel, yet they are being tasked on a regular basis to deploy in support of worldwide TDC requirements.
Requirement:
There is a cost effective solution, which will enable the units to train and provide their personnel a means to stay current and obtain the required, ever changing certifications necessary. A very practical cost effective solution would be to purchase a TDC/FSAT Simulation suite. This simulation suite has most of the key components of the TDC ICAP package and the AN/USC-60 FSAT Terminal enabling units to train and be ready to go at a moment’s notice with very minimal training. The other real plus, other than this package is considerably less expensive than a full TDC package, is the fact that it does not deploy and unit personnel who haven’t deployed, and are projected to deploy in next rotations, will have the capability to train and obtain the necessary certifications at home station. This will enable the personnel at home station to be ready to go when they are due to rotate or back fill the first package to deploy. Another advantage is the fact the components of this simulator package by in large, will be a part of the next generation of communications equipment after TDC.
Senior Leadership of the Air National Guard agrees that this equipment is relevant and desperately needed. Lt Gen Daniel James has placed this need on his Air Guard unfunded list, which tells the Air Force that this simulator package is extremely critical to the relevance and readiness of the Air National Guard and must be procured now.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense and the Congress of the United States strongly support the modernization efforts of the Air Force to fully fund the TDC Integrated Communications Access Package Simulator along with the USC-60 FSAT SATCOM Terminal Combat Communications unit to ensure the continued relevance and readiness of personnel to support national security objectives both globally and at home.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-1 (B-7 last year/Army –new)

RELATING TO THE NEED TO FULLY RESOURCE COTS SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS FOR THE NATIONAL GUARD COUNTERDRUG UNITS AND SUPPORT HOMELAND SECURITY MISSIONS

Background:
The National Guard is the principal military component of the Department of Defense of the United States capable of providing full-time active duty aviation and ground support for counter drug and public safety assistance to civilian authorities. The aviation units are known as Reconnaissance And Interdiction Detachments (RAIDs) and play a vital role in support of civilian public safety agencies and surveillance activities. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 demonstrated that National Guard forces need additional equipment to meet emerging missions, not only for RAID but for Homeland Security missions. The Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) surveillance systems, Gyro-Stabilized "Stedi-Eye" Binoculars with night vision and video downlink systems are in short supply. This specialized, multifunctional equipment will allow National Guard forces to conduct surveillance missions important to the Homeland Security of the United States. This system interfaces with the current downlink system which provides crucial "real time" video to command centers. This system is immediately available, providing state of the art surveillance capability today. This system is also interoperable with many civilian law enforcement agencies. The Stedi-Eye is procure-able through GSA. Other US Army and DOD agencies are currently operating with Stedi-Eye systems.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations to urge the National Guard Bureau, the Department of Army, The Department of Defense and the Congress of the United States to procure and equip the Army National Guard RAIDs with COTS Surveillance Systems such as the Stedi-Eye.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-2 (Army – new)

PROCUREMENT OF TACTICAL MILITARY GENERATOR SETS

Background:
The National Guard is a key element of the Total Force and a cornerstone of our national security. This requires equipping the National Guard with modern equipment that is compatible with the Active Components’ inventory and shares their same capabilities. A central element to this is the effective generation of electric power to meet the warfighter and support elements’ needs. The current fielded generator fleet is old and costly with more than 60% Army-wide utilizing 1960s technology, with a far higher percentage in the National Guard. It is critical to modernize and standardize the generator fleet. A very important member of this fleet is the 2kW Military Tactical Generator (MTG) set. This diesel engine powered generator set replaces much older, more costly, and far less reliable systems. Little more than half of the Army’s required 7,623 MTG sets have been fielded, with again, a lesser percentage in the National Guard. Even though more than 1,000 sets have been fielded to the National Guard, a critical need exists to fully execute the required fielding. To better support the National Guard’s operations throughout its force, it is essential to complete the fielding of the Military Tactical Generator sets as soon as practicable.

Recommendation:

It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense and the Congress strongly support immediate procurement and fielding of the 2kW Military Tactical Generator sets as required to enable the National Guard to effectively operate in its role as a part of the Total Force.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-3 (Army – new)

SMALL ARMS FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS (SAFCS II) FOR THE MK19 GRENADE LAUNCHER

Background:
First-hit accuracy is essential and the key to multiplying warfighters’ lethality, survivability, and overmatch capability through enhancing small arms firepower. By integrating advanced electro-optical, laser, computer, and mechanical systems technologies, the SAFCS II enables soldiers to precisely locate, view, track, and engage targets. The system provides high-resolution daylight and un-cooled IR imaging for long-range target identification & surveillance, an eyesafe laser rangefinder, along with system correction for temperature, atmospheric pressure, crosswind, and weapon cant. In addition to the MK 19, it may be adapted to the M2 .50 caliber machine gun.

With the MK 19, a typical target at 1000m may be engaged with the SAFCS II with a first burst hit probability of 54%. The standard MK 19 without fire control provides a first burst hit probability of 3%. In additional to the several key capabilities provided the warfighter cited above, costs per kill are significantly reduced. With MK 19 ammunition costs of $15 to $20 per round, a five round burst costs about $100. This equates to significant cost and/or ammunition savings.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense and the Congress strongly support funding to field the SAFCS II system thereby significantly enhancing the warfighters’ lethality, survivability, and overmatch capability.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-4 (Army – new)

DIRECT APPOINTMENT OF SENIOR NCOs (E7-E9) AS WARRANT OFFICERS

Background:
Warrant Officer position fill has gradually decreased from 9,923 in 1988 to just over 7400 today. Warrant Officer technical service position shortages in the Army National Guard are most critical and adversely impact personnel readiness. There is a critical need to implement a direct appointment option for highly qualified senior non-commissioned officers.

Technical Service Warrant Officer shortages have reached a critical level within the Army National Guard adversely impacting readiness. This is particularly critical in view of the OPTEMPO demands being placed on the ARNG for Homeland Security and overseas deployments. As of December 2003, technical fill is 69% of authorized. Shortages are severe in MI at 34% of fill, QM at 59% of fill, FA at 61% of fill, and OD at 66% of fill.

There are 521 gains per year projected from all sources (based on a 5 year average) during the next 10 years. There are 686 projected losses form all sources (based on a 5 year average) during the next 10 years. The projected number of Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS) graduates per year is 193 for Tech Service (based on a 5-year average). 64% of all ARNG Warrant Officers are retirement eligible, indicating an aging population.

Traditional Commissioned Officers currently have five commissioning sources, USMA, ROTC, Federal OCS, State OCS, and Direct Commissioning. The Warrant Officer Corps has one appointment source, the Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS) at Fort Rucker, Alabama. The ARNG needs a second source of appointment to provide the ability to meet current and future shortages. The demographics of the ARNG, because of the stability of its membership and community based nature, depicts a large population of highly experienced enlisted soldiers in grades E7 and above. In most cases, these senior NCOs have served more than 10 years in their military occupational specialties. In addition, they have completed Leadership training through the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course level (ANCOC).

Senior NCOs (E7-E9) bring a great degree of technical skills and proven leadership experience. They will not, however, apply for WOCS in large numbers because of a reluctance to return to a basic training type environment. Creating a program for senior NCOs is a readiness multiplier because warrant officers appointed by this method would immediately contribute to a commander's mission requirements. Senior NCO appointments will satisfy the short-term need for technical service warrant officers while increasing the overall experience level of the ARNG warrant officer force.

The current WOCS program of instruction provides 65% of the common core subjects already received by enlisted soldiers during PLDC, BNCOC, and ANCOC. This is an unnecessary duplication of training. Recommend each directly appointed candidate be required to attend a Warrant Officer Candidate Transition Course (WOCTC), providing instruction on the remaining subjects as well as other appropriate officership type training.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations to urge NGB for their pursuit to implement a direct appointment option for selected senior ARNG non-commissioned officers in grade E7 and above who have completed ANCOC. Require that each applicant under this program meet the same standards established by NGR 600-101, as those that qualify to attend a Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS). In addition each applicant must attend a Warrant Officer Candidate Transition Course (WOTC-RC), for 15 days within one year of appointment by the federal recognition board. This will reduce the active duty training requirement by 15 days and attract a new pool of outstanding NCOs, enhancing warrant officer recruiting and therefore personnel readiness within the Army National Guard.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-5 (Army –new)

BONUSES FOR NEWLY APPOINTED AND COMMISSIONED OFFICERS AND WARRANT OFFICERS

Background:
National Guard units continue to report a shortage of junior officers. An incentive is needed to encourage qualified enlisted soldiers and airmen to pursue a commission. A bonus program should be developed under the following guidelines to increase the number of junior officers thereby enhancing individual unit readiness.

(a) Any enlisted service member who is appointed/commissioned in the Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of an armed service for a term of service not less than six years, has not previously served as a commissioned officer in an armed service and is not a recipient of this special pay may be paid a bonus as provided for in subsection (b).

(b) The amount and method of a bonus paid under subsection (a) shall be determined in accordance with regulations prescribed under subsection (d), except that the amount of bonus may not exceed $8,000.

(c) An enlisted service member who has previously received an enlistment bonus is eligible for this program as long as the term of service required under the previous bonus program has been satisfactorily met.

(1) Not more than one-half of the bonus shall be paid upon completion of the initial active duty for training of the service member; and

(2) The remainder of the bonus may be paid in periodic installments over the six year term of service or in lump sum, as directed by the appropriate service Secretary.

(d) This section shall be administered under the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense for the armed services under jurisdiction and by the Secretary of Homeland Security for the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy.

(e) A service member who fails to satisfactorily participate in their unit training during the term of service for which the bonus has been paid to them under this section shall refund an amount which has been paid to them in proportion to the un-expired term of service as it bares to the total length of such term of service.

(f) No bonus may be paid under this section to any service member who, after December 31, 2002, serves in the selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve of an armed service.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations to strongly urge the Congress of the United States to appropriate funds and support a program to pay newly appointed Warrant and Commissioned officers an $8,000 bonus.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-6 (Army – new)

CONTINUED SUPPORT FOR ALL STRYKER BRIGADE COMBAT TEAMS

Background:
On October 12, 1999, the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Staff of the Army articulated a vision designed to posture the Army to better meet the demands of the 21st Century. To achieve the vision requires a comprehensive transformation of the entire Army. The transformed force envisioned is an Objective Force that will be responsive, deployable, agile, versatile, lethal, survivable, and sustainable. To bridge the gap between today’s force and the Objective Force, the Army established the Stryker Brigade Combat Teams (SBCTs). Six SBCTs are scheduled for fielding; the last of which is for the Army National Guard.

The Army leadership continues to support fielding of six SBCTs to meet operational requirements and has included funding for all six brigades in its recent POM submission. DoD has stipulated that brigades five and six have increased transformational capabilities.

The Army and DoD have selected thousands of items of equipment and several types of vehicles and variants to be fielded with these transformational brigades. These vehicles and equipment items must receive continued support in order to be fielded to all six brigades.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that NGAUS, NGB, the Department of the Army, and the DoD urge the Congress to ensure continued funding in FY 06-11 of the 6 Stryker Brigade Combat Teams, to include the ARNG SBCT. This ensures timely fielding of the all equipment identified by the Army for this phase of transformation. It is further recommended that DoD provide sufficient funding, and that the Department of the Army use those resources to meet its original goal of having the 6th SBCT meet Initial Operating Capability (IOC) at the originally scheduled time frame of FY 08.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-7 (Air - new)

RELATING TO THE EXPEDITIONARY MEDICAL SUPPORT (EMEDS) EQUIPMENT PACKAGE

Background:
The current concept of operations of the U.S. Air Force uses the Expeditionary Medical Support (EMEDS) concept as the deployable medical/surgical system. These systems are deployed incrementally to fit a specific worldwide mission. There is currently a nationwide Air National Guard un-funded plan to place one EMEDS +50 (50 Beds) in each Federal Emergency Management Area (FEMA) region. The 171st Medical Group located in Pittsburgh (PA), is one of the few units in the nation that has personnel trained for the EMEDS, but has none of the equipment to support an EMEDS at the Pittsburgh location. Placing an equipment package at the Pittsburgh location (FEMA Region III) allows 171st Medical Group personnel to ensure they have the necessary tools to deploy and treat accordingly. Additionally, the package would remain ready and available to other Air National Guard units throughout the nation with similar personnel capabilities; even outside of established FEMA regions, if necessary. With taskings throughout the country for ANG units being unpredictable, and postured for homeland defense activity, the EMEDS+50 would be strategically placed on the Eastern seaboard for others to use in rapid deployment scenarios. Pittsburgh incorporates both the correct geographic location, airport runway capabilities and trained personnel to store and maintain the package.

The EMEDS +50 provides for a spectrum of care/service including 24-hour sick call, emergency medical care (including ACLS/ATLS), in-patient (50) and out-patient services, Laboratory, Pharmacy, X-Ray, Dental, Administration/Command and Logistics/Biomedical Equipment Support for Aerospace Expeditionary Support (AEF) deployed personnel. It can be deployed on a “moments notice” anywhere throughout the world within days, and within CONUS in less than 24 hours.

In order to support deployment of an EMEDS in a timely manner, it is imperative that both trained personnel and the associated equipment be ready in a short suspense timeframe. The Pittsburgh unit would be the ideal place to train, and maintain this approximate 2.8 million dollar EMEDS+50 equipment package. The equipment has dual usage and can augment civil authorities in the case of a homeland security incident or a natural disaster within FEMA III region or anywhere nationwide. The equipment package will also assist in the ongoing training required for 171st Medical Group personnel, remain available to host other nationwide Air National Guard units and would provide a completed component (trained personnel and equipment) package with it’s wartime equipment needs. Our duty is to optimize unit clinical treatment capabilities and modernize to improve patient care, respond to nationwide emergencies or provide a global reach capability within a defined time constraint.

Recommendation:
It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that NGAUS, NGB, the Department of the Air Force, the DoD, and the Congress of the United States support funding to:
• Procure the Expeditionary Medical Support (EMEDS) equipment package for pre-positioning at the 171st Medical Group located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
• This recommendation benefits EMEDS tasking both worldwide and in homeland defense domestic disaster scenarios using the 171st Medical Group for this specific FEMA III region.
• The EMEDS+50 package should be available for use both within the FEMA III region and to other units nationwide for training or actual deployments within the entire spectrum of military operations.
• The 171st Medical Group is well supported by the Pittsburgh medical community from a recruiting perspective due to over 100 hospitals and over 9,000 providers in and around the immediate Pittsburgh area; essential for present and future personnel needs.
• There are approximately six (6) other large Air National Guard units that possess the same medical personnel capabilities that could garner direct benefits from the EMEDS+50 package pre-positioned at the 171st MDS, Pittsburgh ANG unit; availability can be made to smaller ANG units throughout the country that require training on this larger equipment package.
• This package is deployable anywhere throughout the country and would remain available, as domestic crisis situations would dictate.
• Realistically, disaster preparedness may require two or three of these units to be pulled from any of the FEMA regions where assigned, to be airlifted to another area where a disaster or homeland threat may have occurred.
• Continue ongoing re-supply of expired medications and personnel needed to track and support that function.
• Finally, the Air Force Medical Service must be operationally capable of providing a tiered and tailored medical capability that is driven by mission, threat scenario, airlift availability and population at risk; the recommendation to place an EMEDS+50 pre-positioned in Western Pennsylvania can serve both a nationwide and global need

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-8 (Joint - new)

RELATING TO THE BUY BACK OF TITLE 32 ACTIVE DUTY TIME FOR MILITARY TECHNICIANS

Background

The current world situation and downsizing of our active military forces has resulted in a "Total Force", Active, Guard and Reserve, performing duty side-by-side. The National Guard and Reserve Components maintain the same readiness standards as their active duty counterparts and participate in real world contingencies on a regular and more frequent basis. Over the years, the National Guard and Reserve Components have increasingly contributed to the superior capabilities of the nation’s military; however, incentives to join and serve their country still do not mirror those of the active component soldiers and airmen they serve alongside. A variety of benefits are available to members of the active, National Guard and Reserve Components, but some of those benefits are inequitable between active and National Guard and Reserve Components. Many of those inequities have been identified and corrected by Congress, but some still exist and need to be addressed. These inequities cause animosity between the components and create an appearance of unfairness for members of the National Guard and Reserve Components. Service while on active duty Title 10 status is eligible for credit to the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), while certain periods of service in Title 32 status, even though it may be performing identical work, is not creditable.

Recommendation

It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, the Department of the Air Force, and the Department of Defense urge the Congress of the United States to enact Legislation to change civil service policy so as to resolve the existing inequity by allowing Title 32 active duty time to be counted the same as Title 10 active duty time in the determination of federal service computation dates, for all periods of honorable service in Title 32.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-9 (Joint – new)

RELATING TO TAX INCENTIVES TO EMPLOYERS OF RESERVE COMPONENT MILITARY PERSONNEL

Background:

The businesses that employ members of the National Guard and other Reserve Forces forge an essential link in the chain of support for the Guard and Reserve. As operations tempos have increased and more-and-more Guard and Reserve members are called to service for extended periods, the pressures on private employers have increased. There is a recognized loss to the employer when an employee is mobilized in support of an operation or contingency.
Employers are generally supportive of the military obligations of the Guard and Reserve members who work for them, but with valued employees absent for long periods of time, employers must either do without or hire and train temporary replacements. Small businesses are particularly hard hit by the loss of employees for several months. Employer concerns are often cited as primary reasons why individuals decide to leave the Guard and Reserve.
It takes exceptional, dedicated and ambitious citizens to take on the responsibility of a reserve obligation along with maintaining a full-time career. Guard and Reserve forces struggle yearly to meet retention goals in support of the defense of our nation. It is a benefit to the military and our country that we have adequate personnel as members of the reserve forces.
There are several ways that a grateful Nation and Commonwealth can acknowledge the sacrifice and patriotism of employers of members of the Guard and Reserve and provide incentives to employers to create jobs and provide compensation to their Guard and Reserve members. Action is needed at both the federal and the state level.
• The federal government should provide a tax incentive to employers of members of the Guard and Reserve. This tax incentive could take the form of an employer credit against federal income tax for employees who participate in the Guard or Reserve, together with a comparable credit for participating self-employed Guard and Reserve members. The National Guard Association of the United States and the Enlisted Association of the National Guard of the United States are on record in support of several pieces of federal legislation to provide tax incentives to employers.
• The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania should provide a tax incentive to employers of members of the Guard and Reserve who perform state active duty, special state duty or federal military service for seven or more consecutive days and who pay their employees the difference between their civilian pay and their Guard and Reserve pay. Such employers should receive a tax credit equal to the amount of additional compensation they pay their Guard and Reserve employees up to a maximum annual amount established by law.
• The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania should provide a tax incentive to employers of members of the Guard and Reserve who perform state active duty, special state duty or federal military service for 30 or more consecutive days and who hire temporary employees to fill in for the Guard and Reserve member while mobilized. This incentive should take the form of a tax credit covering a percentage (25% to 30%) of the compensation paid to the temporary employee up to a maximum annual amount established by law.

Recommendation:

It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the United States Congress pass legislation to provide a federal tax incentive to employers of members of the Guard and Reserve and that the Pennsylvania General Assembly pass state legislation to provide a state tax incentive to employers of members of the Guard and Reserve.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-10 (Joint – new)

RELATING TO FAIR CREDIT REPORTING FOR MEMBERS OF
THE NATIONAL GUARD
AND RESERVE COMPONENTS

Background:

Today’s increased operational tempo has placed increased fiscal strains on many members of the Guard and Reserve who are ordered to federal service in support of contingencies around the globe.

Although the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act and other laws provide some protection for mobilized Guard and Reserve members from civil actions and with regard to personal debt, there have been instances where Guard and Reserve members deployed overseas have had their credit histories impaired as a result of their military service. Soldiers and airmen have come home to find themselves faced with negative credit reports that adversely affect their ability to qualify for car loans, mortgages or other credit.

Federal legislation is needed to amend applicable credit reporting laws to provide that whenever a negative credit report is issued as a result or, or related to, the financial consequences of the military service of a member of the National Guard or Reserve, the report will, upon request of the member, be corrected or expunged. At a minimum, this legislation should provide that the credit rating of a member of the National Guard and Reserve will not be lowered when the member can show that their military service had a material negative financial impact.

Recommendation:

The Pennsylvania National Guard Associations recommend that the United States Congress pass fair credit reporting legislation to protect members of the National Guard and Reserve who are ordered to federal military service from negative credit reports resulting from the financial impacts of such service.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-11 (Army – New)

RELATING TO A DEDICATED ARNG SCHOLARSHIP FOR ROTC

Background

A dedicated Army National Guard (ARNG) Scholarship for Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) candidates is an important and integral program that assists many National Guard soldiers seeking commissions through the ROTC program. The dedicated ARNG scholarship is vital to the future growth of the ARNG Officer Corps. The dedicated ARNG scholarship enables soldiers to use Chapter 30 GI Bill, but excludes soldiers eligible for Chapter 1606 Benefits.

Recommendation

It is the recommendation of the Pennsylvania National Guard Associations that the National Guard Bureau, the Department of the Army, and the Department of Defense urge the Congress of the United States to enact Legislation to enable soldiers eligible for Chapter 1606 GI benefits to utilize the same with this scholarship.

20TH PNGAS GENERAL CONFERENCE - 23-25 APRIL 2004

RESOLUTION NO. D-12 (Joint – new)

RELATING TO EXCLUDING ALL MILITARY PAY FROM
THE DEFINITION OF EARNED INCOME FOR
LOCAL INCOME TAXES

Background:

On 5 April 2004, Governor Rendell signed into law Act 24 (HB1206). This bill exempts all active duty military pay from the local earned income tax. Its provisions are retroactive to January 1, 2003.
The original Local Tax Enabling Act (Act 511) exempted active duty military pay from local taxation. Beginning in 2003 with the enactment of Act 166, locally taxable compensation was redefined to conform to the definition used for PA Personal Income Tax purposes. Under this definition, active duty military pay earned in Pennsylvania by Pennsylvania residents is taxable income for local income tax purposes. This meant that with the passage of Act 166, some active duty military pay became taxable to local jurisdictions.
Act 24 of 2004 changed the treatment of active duty military pay back to the way it was under the original Act 511 – exempt from local tax. Since this law is retroactive to January 1, 2003, it may be necessary to amend the local returns of active duty military taxpayers.
Until February 2003, local earned income taxes (typically 1% or 2% of earned income) had long excluded active duty military pay from taxation. The attempt to include active duty pay earned in Pennsylvania for local income tax purposes was turned back by the enactment of Act 24 of 2004. The need for a legislative fix in this area illustrates how confusing local earned income tax collections can be both for military members and local taxing authorities.

Instead of just restoring the status quo with regard to the treatment of active duty pay for local tax purposes, we believe the General Assembly should have excluded all military pay (active duty and inactive duty) from the definition of earned income.

The current distinction between active and inactive duty pay makes no sense in today’s National Guard. A soldier or airman could (and often does) perform some inactive duty outside the Commonwealth. The current pace of training and operational tempo means that duties and training performed in IDT status are often the same as duties performed in AT status. The current system places an unfair burden on Guard and Reserve personnel vis-à-vis their active duty counterparts since only members of the reserve components earn “inactive duty” pay.

Recommendation:

The Pennsylvania National Guard Associations recommend that the Pennsylvania General Assembly pass legislation to exclude all military pay (active duty and inactive duty) from the definition of “earned income” for local income tax purposes.